{"id":2803,"date":"2015-06-08T22:21:55","date_gmt":"2015-06-08T22:21:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/capeco.org.py\/?page_id=2803"},"modified":"2021-05-26T08:45:54","modified_gmt":"2021-05-26T12:45:54","slug":"soja-satelital-es","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/capeco.org.py\/en\/soja-satelital-es\/","title":{"rendered":"Estudio Satelital"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Espa\u00f1ol<\/a>.<\/p>

[vc_row rt_row_background_width=”default” rt_row_style=”default-style” rt_row_borders=”” rt_row_paddings=”true” rt_bg_effect=”classic” rt_bg_image_repeat=”repeat” rt_bg_size=”cover” rt_bg_position=”right top” rt_bg_attachment=”scroll” rt_bg_video_format=”self-hosted”][vc_column rt_wrp_col_paddings=”false” rt_border_top=”” rt_border_bottom=”” rt_border_left=”” rt_border_right=”” rt_border_top_mobile=”” rt_border_bottom_mobile=”” rt_border_left_mobile=”” rt_border_right_mobile=”” rt_bg_image_repeat=”repeat” rt_bg_size=”auto auto” rt_bg_position=”right top” rt_bg_attachment=”scroll”]

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

Estudio Satelital <\/h2>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>[\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row rt_row_background_width=”default” rt_row_style=”default-style” rt_row_borders=”” rt_row_paddings=”true” rt_bg_effect=”classic” rt_bg_image_repeat=”repeat” rt_bg_size=”cover” rt_bg_position=”right top” rt_bg_attachment=”scroll” rt_bg_video_format=”self-hosted”][vc_column rt_wrp_col_paddings=”false” rt_border_top=”” rt_border_bottom=”” rt_border_left=”” rt_border_right=”” rt_border_top_mobile=”” rt_border_bottom_mobile=”” rt_border_left_mobile=”” rt_border_right_mobile=”” rt_bg_image_repeat=”repeat” rt_bg_size=”auto auto” rt_bg_position=”right top” rt_bg_attachment=”scroll”][vc_tabs tabs_style=”style-1″][vc_tab title=”SOJA” tab_id=”1435777054517-3″][vc_single_image image=”6035″ img_size=”full”]
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

Superficie comparativa de SOJA ZAFRA<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

2017-2018 vs 2018-2019<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>[vc_column_text] <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
 Departamento<\/td>\n Campa\u00f1a 2017-2018
\nsuperfice (ha)<\/td>\n		 Campa\u00f1a 2018-2019
\nsuperficie (ha)<\/td>\n		 Diferencia
\n(ha)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
 Concepci\u00f3n<\/td>\n31.182<\/td>\n25.146<\/td>\n(6.036)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
 San Pedro<\/td>\n 367.660<\/td>\n319.701<\/td>\n(47.959)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
 Guair\u00e1<\/td>\n 17.664<\/td>\n17.864<\/td>\n200<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Caaguazu<\/td>\n 419.589<\/td>\n427.338<\/td>\n7.749<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Caazap\u00e1<\/td>\n 187.391<\/td>\n210.317<\/td>\n22.926<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Itap\u00faa<\/td>\n692.469<\/td>\n768.906<\/td>\n76.437<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
 Misiones<\/td>\n53.715<\/td>\n47.689<\/td>\n(6.026)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
 Paraguari<\/td>\n634<\/td>\n306<\/td>\n(328)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Alto Paran\u00e1<\/td>\n905.959<\/td>\n949.400<\/td>\n43.441<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Amambay<\/td>\n200.184<\/td>\n137.246<\/td>\n(62.938)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Canindey\u00fa<\/td>\n634.696<\/td>\n640.331<\/td>\n5.635<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Totales<\/td>\n3.511.143<\/td>\n3.544.245<\/td>\n33.102<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 [\/vc_column_text][vc_separator style=”style-1″]

<\/span><\/a><\/div>
\n\t

\n\t\t\n\t\t\tHistorial de la superficie sembrada de SOJA por departamento. Campa\u00f1a 2000-2001 a 2014-2015\n\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/h3> <\/div><\/article>[\/vc_tab][vc_tab title=”GIRASOL” tab_id=”1435777055114-2″][vc_single_image image=”3111″ img_size=”full”][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n

Estudio Satelital de la distribuci\u00f3n del cultivo de GIRASOL campa\u00f1a 2013\/2014<\/strong><\/p>\n

En la Regi\u00f3n Oriental del Paraguay.<\/p>\n

[\/vc_column_text]

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

Superficie comparativa de Girasol campa\u00f1a<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

2012-2013 vs 2013-2014<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>[vc_column_text]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Departamento<\/td>\nCampa\u00f1a 2013
\nsuperficie (ha)<\/td>\n		Campa\u00f1a 2014
\nsuperficie (ha)<\/td>\n		Diferencia
\n(ha)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
 Concepci\u00f3n<\/td>\n –<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
 San Pedro<\/td>\n 1.226<\/td>\n194<\/td>\n-1.031<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Guair\u00e1<\/td>\n –<\/td>\n18<\/td>\n18<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
 Caaguaz\u00fa<\/td>\n 3.808<\/td>\n3.234<\/td>\n-574<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Caazap\u00e1<\/td>\n 4.655<\/td>\n5.048<\/td>\n393<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Itap\u00faa<\/td>\n24.841<\/td>\n18.023<\/td>\n-6.818<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Misiones<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Alto Paran\u00e1<\/td>\n 16.798<\/td>\n12.345<\/td>\n-4.452<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Canindey\u00fa<\/td>\n 2.430<\/td>\n2.244<\/td>\n-186<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Totales<\/td>\n53.757<\/td>\n41.107<\/td>\n-12.649<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[\/vc_column_text][vc_single_image image=”3110″ img_size=”full”][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n

Evoluci\u00f3n del \u00e1rea sembrada de GIRASOL en la Regi\u00f3n Oriental del Paraguay, campa\u00f1a 2010 a 2014, seg\u00fan an\u00e1lisis geoespacial.<\/p>\n

[\/vc_column_text]

<\/span><\/a><\/div>
\n\t

\n\t\t\n\t\t\tEvoluci\u00f3n del \u00e1rea de siembra de girasol por Departamento en la Regi\u00f3n Oriental del Paraguay, campa\u00f1a 2010 a 2014.\n\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/h3> <\/div><\/article>[\/vc_tab][vc_tab title=”TRIGO” tab_id=”1435782831882-2-4″][vc_single_image image=”3115″ img_size=”full”][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n

Distribuci\u00f3n espacial 2014 del cultivo de trigo en el Paraguay<\/strong><\/p>\n

Distribuci\u00f3n espacial del cultivo de trigo en la Regi\u00f3n Oriental del Paraguay seg\u00fan estudio geoespacial 2014<\/p>\n

[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Departamento<\/td>\nCampa\u00f1a 2013
\nsuperficie (ha)<\/td>\n		Campa\u00f1a 2014
\nsuperficie (ha)<\/td>\n		Diferencia
\n(ha)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
 San Pedro<\/td>\n 18.970<\/td>\n19.129<\/td>\n159<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Guair\u00e1<\/td>\n 2.588<\/td>\n1.999<\/td>\n-589<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
 Caaguaz\u00fa<\/td>\n 59.128<\/td>\n63.669<\/td>\n4.541<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Caazap\u00e1<\/td>\n 64.463<\/td>\n 56.674<\/td>\n-7.790<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Itap\u00faa<\/td>\n 216.311<\/td>\n185.438<\/td>\n-30.873<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Misiones<\/td>\n 12.109<\/td>\n10.992<\/td>\n-1.117<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Alto Paran\u00e1<\/td>\n 140.218<\/td>\n 205.995<\/td>\n 65.777<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Amambay<\/td>\n 13.240<\/td>\n13.133<\/td>\n-106<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Canindey\u00fa<\/td>\n 24.338<\/td>\n74.661<\/td>\n50.323<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Totales<\/td>\n 551.365<\/td>\n631.690<\/td>\n80.325<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n

Superficie comparativa del cultivo de trigo por departamento – Campa\u00f1a 2013 vs 2014.<\/p>\n

[\/vc_column_text][vc_single_image image=”3116″ img_size=”full”]

<\/span><\/a><\/div>
\n\t

\n\t\t\n\t\t\tHistorial evoluci\u00f3n superficie sembrada de TRIGO por departamento 2009 a 2014\n\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>

Historial de la evoluci\u00f3n de la superficie sembrada de trigo por departamento en la Regi\u00f3n Oriental del Paraguay – Campa\u00f1a 2009 a 2014 – seg\u00fan estudio geoespacial.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/article>[\/vc_tab][vc_tab title=”MAIZ” tab_id=”1435783716789-3-4″][vc_single_image image=”3618″ img_size=”full”][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Departamento<\/td>\n2014 (ha)<\/td>\n2015 (ha)<\/td>\nDiferencia
\n(ha)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Concepci\u00f3n<\/td>\n3.365<\/td>\n5.103<\/td>\n1.738<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
San Pedro<\/td>\n51.923<\/td>\n83.387<\/td>\n31.464<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Guair\u00e1<\/td>\n1.861<\/td>\n2.911<\/td>\n1.050<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Caaguaz\u00fa<\/td>\n105.010<\/td>\n136.140<\/td>\n31.130<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Caazap\u00e1<\/td>\n20.988<\/td>\n53.873<\/td>\n32.885<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Itap\u00faa<\/td>\n26.313<\/td>\n56.869<\/td>\n30.556<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Misiones<\/td>\n16.894<\/td>\n3.123<\/td>\n(13.771)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Alto Paran\u00e1<\/td>\n223.070<\/td>\n254.143<\/td>\n31.073<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Amambay<\/td>\n13.943<\/td>\n45.688<\/td>\n31.745<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
 Canindey\u00fa<\/td>\n186.366<\/td>\n197.527<\/td>\n11.161<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Totales<\/td>\n649.733<\/td>\n838.768<\/td>\n189.035<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[\/vc_column_text][vc_single_image image=”3633″ img_size=”full”][vc_separator style=”style-1″][vc_single_image image=”3634″ img_size=”full”][\/vc_tab][vc_tab title=”CANOLA” tab_id=”1435788511001-4-8″][vc_single_image image=”3125″ img_size=”full”][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n

Distribuci\u00f3n espacial 2014 del cultivo de Canola en el Paraguay<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Departamento<\/td>\nCAMPA\u00d1A 2013
\nsuperficie (ha)<\/td>\n		CAMPA\u00d1A 2014
\nsuperficie (ha)<\/td>\n		Diferencia
\n(ha)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
 Concepci\u00f3n<\/td>\n208<\/td>\n143<\/td>\n-65<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
San Pedro<\/td>\n538<\/td>\n714<\/td>\n176<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Guair\u00e1<\/td>\n408<\/td>\n286<\/td>\n-123<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Caaguaz\u00fa<\/td>\n6.196<\/td>\n4.996<\/td>\n-1.200<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Caazap\u00e1<\/td>\n6.617<\/td>\n2.284<\/td>\n-4.332<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Itap\u00faa<\/td>\n15.702<\/td>\n8.708<\/td>\n-6.994<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
 Misiones<\/td>\n334<\/td>\n286<\/td>\n-49<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Alto Paran\u00e1<\/td>\n15.454<\/td>\n12.562<\/td>\n-2.982<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Canindey\u00fa<\/td>\n1.318<\/td>\n1.570<\/td>\n252<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Totales<\/td>\n46.775<\/td>\n31.549<\/td>\n-15.226<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[\/vc_column_text][vc_single_image image=”3127″ img_size=”full”][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n

Hist\u00f3rico de la superficie sembrada de Canola en la Regi\u00f3n Oriental del Paraguay – Campa\u00f1a 2009 a 2014.<\/p>\n

[\/vc_column_text]

<\/span><\/a><\/div>
\n\t

\n\t\t\n\t\t\tEvoluci\u00f3n del \u00c1rea cultivada de Canola en la Regi\u00f3n Oriental del Paraguay\n\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>

Por departamento – Campa\u00f1a 2A009 a 2014; seg\u00fan an\u00e1lisis geoespacial..<\/p>\n<\/div><\/article>[\/vc_tab][vc_tab title=”SOJA ENTREZAFRA” tab_id=”1451483278955-5-10″][vc_text_separator title=”Se recomienda firmemente la eliminaci\u00f3n de esta pr\u00e1ctica.” color=”juicy_pink”]

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

Soja entrezafra o Soja “zafri\u00f1a”<\/h1>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>[vc_single_image image=”3618″ img_size=”full”][vc_single_image image=”3628″ img_size=”full”][vc_separator style=”style-1″][vc_single_image image=”3629″ img_size=”full”][\/vc_tab][\/vc_tabs][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Espa\u00f1ol.[vc_row rt_row_background_width=”default” rt_row_style=”default-style” rt_row_borders=”” rt_row_paddings=”true” rt_bg_effect=”classic” rt_bg_image_repeat=”repeat” rt_bg_size=”cover” rt_bg_position=”right top” rt_bg_attachment=”scroll” rt_bg_video_format=”self-hosted”][vc_column rt_wrp_col_paddings=”false” rt_border_top=”” rt_border_bottom=”” rt_border_left=”” rt_border_right=”” rt_border_top_mobile=”” rt_border_bottom_mobile=”” rt_border_left_mobile=”” rt_border_right_mobile=”” rt_bg_image_repeat=”repeat” rt_bg_size=”auto auto” rt_bg_position=”right top” rt_bg_attachment=”scroll”][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row rt_row_background_width=”default” rt_row_style=”default-style” rt_row_borders=”” rt_row_paddings=”true” rt_bg_effect=”classic” rt_bg_image_repeat=”repeat” rt_bg_size=”cover” rt_bg_position=”right top” rt_bg_attachment=”scroll” rt_bg_video_format=”self-hosted”][vc_column rt_wrp_col_paddings=”false” rt_border_top=”” rt_border_bottom=”” rt_border_left=”” rt_border_right=”” rt_border_top_mobile=”” rt_border_bottom_mobile=”” rt_border_left_mobile=”” rt_border_right_mobile=”” rt_bg_image_repeat=”repeat” […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":3385,"parent":0,"menu_order":65,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2803","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"better_featured_image":{"id":3385,"alt_text":"","caption":"","description":"","media_type":"image","media_details":{"width":980,"height":162,"file":"2015\/08\/perspectivas-climaticas.png","sizes":{"thumbnail":{"file":"perspectivas-climaticas-150x150.png","width":150,"height":150,"mime-type":"image\/png","source_url":"https:\/\/capeco.org.py\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/08\/perspectivas-climaticas-150x150.png"},"medium":{"file":"perspectivas-climaticas-300x50.png","width":300,"height":50,"mime-type":"image\/png","source_url":"https:\/\/capeco.org.py\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/08\/perspectivas-climaticas-300x50.png"},"large":{"file":"perspectivas-climaticas-930x154.png","width":930,"height":154,"mime-type":"image\/png","source_url":"https:\/\/capeco.org.py\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/08\/perspectivas-climaticas-930x154.png"}},"image_meta":{"aperture":0,"credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":0,"copyright":"","focal_length":0,"iso":0,"shutter_speed":0,"title":"","orientation":0}},"post":null,"source_url":"https:\/\/capeco.org.py\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/08\/perspectivas-climaticas.png"},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/capeco.org.py\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2803","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/capeco.org.py\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/capeco.org.py\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/capeco.org.py\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/capeco.org.py\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2803"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/capeco.org.py\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2803\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6036,"href":"https:\/\/capeco.org.py\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2803\/revisions\/6036"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/capeco.org.py\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3385"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/capeco.org.py\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2803"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/capeco.org.py\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2803"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/capeco.org.py\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2803"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}